TikTok

The principals uncertainty

The latest instalment in the video-app saga is confusingon purpose

 




Sep 26th 2020 | words 421

 

 

 

IF YOU WANT to understand the agreement between TikTok, a Chinese-owned video-sharing service, and Oracle, which sells corporate software (see article), it is useful to think of Schrdingers cat. Like the hypothetical feline of quantum mechanics, simultaneously alive and dead, the deal seems to be in two states at onceone hunky-dory to Beijing but fatally flawed to Washington, the other vice versa.

 

Take the question of who owns TikTok Global, the new company to be spun out of ByteDance, TikToks Chinese owner, to give the data of American users a secure home in America. ByteDance insists that it will hold 80% of the new entity. The Americans say they will control a majority stake. Oracle and Walmart, a supermarket titan which has joined in, will own only 20% of TikTik Global between them. But American venture-capitalists already own 41% of ByteDance. Apply the right maths and both the Chinese parent and the Americans own more than 50% of TikTok Global, which the deal values at $60bn and which is supposed to go public within a year.

 

What about TikToks technology? Beijing says that ByteDances eerily accurate recommendation engine is not for export. Security hawks in America want to ensure no data are diverted and the algorithm is not used to spread misinformation. So the source code will stay in China but Oracle will have access to it. How this will work in practice is about as clear as Schrdingers equation is to non-physicists.

 

In normal times everyone would resolve the ambiguities at the negotiating table. But times arent normal, especially in America. Ahead of Novembers election, President Donald Trump prizes ambiguity. He wants to bash China but not irk Americas 100m users of TikTok, which he has threatened to ban (along with WeChat, a messaging app owned by another Chinese tech giant). A federal body that examines foreign investments in America looks ready to approve the Oracle deal, obviating a Department of Commerce edict banning Americans from doing business with TikTok from September 27th (a federal judge this week blocked the WeChat ban on free-speech grounds). Predictably, mostly positive noises from Washington have provoked angry ones in China, where state media have denounced the deal. Observe Schrdingers cat close enough and it ends up either dead or alive, after all.







\n

Economist | Why the TikTok deal is like Schrodingers cat

 


  

TikTok

The principals uncertainty

The latest instalment in the video-app saga is confusingon purpose

 




Sep 26th 2020 | words 421

 

 

 

IF YOU WANT to understand the agreement between TikTok, a Chinese-owned video-sharing service, and Oracle, which sells corporate software (see article), it is useful to think of Schrdingers cat. Like the hypothetical feline of quantum mechanics, simultaneously alive and dead, the deal seems to be in two states at onceone hunky-dory to Beijing but fatally flawed to Washington, the other vice versa.

 

Take the question of who owns TikTok Global, the new company to be spun out of ByteDance, TikToks Chinese owner, to give the data of American users a secure home in America. ByteDance insists that it will hold 80% of the new entity. The Americans say they will control a majority stake. Oracle and Walmart, a supermarket titan which has joined in, will own only 20% of TikTik Global between them. But American venture-capitalists already own 41% of ByteDance. Apply the right maths and both the Chinese parent and the Americans own more than 50% of TikTok Global, which the deal values at $60bn and which is supposed to go public within a year.

 

What about TikToks technology? Beijing says that ByteDances eerily accurate recommendation engine is not for export. Security hawks in America want to ensure no data are diverted and the algorithm is not used to spread misinformation. So the source code will stay in China but Oracle will have access to it. How this will work in practice is about as clear as Schrdingers equation is to non-physicists.

 

In normal times everyone would resolve the ambiguities at the negotiating table. But times arent normal, especially in America. Ahead of Novembers election, President Donald Trump prizes ambiguity. He wants to bash China but not irk Americas 100m users of TikTok, which he has threatened to ban (along with WeChat, a messaging app owned by another Chinese tech giant). A federal body that examines foreign investments in America looks ready to approve the Oracle deal, obviating a Department of Commerce edict banning Americans from doing business with TikTok from September 27th (a federal judge this week blocked the WeChat ban on free-speech grounds). Predictably, mostly positive noises from Washington have provoked angry ones in China, where state media have denounced the deal. Observe Schrdingers cat close enough and it ends up either dead or alive, after all.







\n

No comments:

Post a Comment